Interbank Rate : Historical Overview of Interbank Rate

Interbank Rate

> Historical Overview of Interbank Rate

What is the historical origin of interbank rates?

The historical origin of interbank rates can be traced back to the emergence of modern banking systems and the need for financial institutions to manage their liquidity and meet the demands of their customers. Interbank rates, also known as interbank lending rates or simply IBOR (Interbank Offered Rates), are interest rates at which banks lend to one another in the interbank market.

The interbank market itself has its roots in the development of banking systems during the 18th and 19th centuries. As economies grew and trade expanded, banks began to emerge as intermediaries between savers and borrowers, facilitating the flow of funds within the financial system. However, banks often faced temporary imbalances in their cash reserves due to fluctuations in customer deposits and loan demand.

To address these liquidity needs, banks started borrowing from each other on a short-term basis. This practice allowed them to manage their cash positions effectively and ensure they had sufficient funds to meet their obligations. The interest rate charged on these interbank loans became known as the interbank rate.

The interbank rate served as a benchmark for short-term borrowing costs within the banking sector. It reflected the prevailing market conditions, including factors such as supply and demand dynamics, credit risk perceptions, and central bank policies. Initially, interbank rates were negotiated directly between banks, but as the interbank market grew in size and complexity, standardized rates began to emerge.

One of the earliest examples of an interbank rate is the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), which originated in the mid-20th century. LIBOR was established by the British Bankers' Association (BBA) in 1984 as a benchmark for short-term interest rates in London's interbank market. It quickly gained global recognition and became widely used as a reference rate for various financial contracts, including loans, derivatives, and bonds.

Over time, other countries and regions developed their own interbank rates. For instance, the Euro Interbank Offered Rate (EURIBOR) was introduced in 1999 for the eurozone, while the Tokyo Interbank Offered Rate (TIBOR) has been used in Japan since the 1980s. These rates, like LIBOR, became important benchmarks for their respective markets.

However, the historical development of interbank rates has not been without challenges. The financial crisis of 2007-2008 exposed several shortcomings in the calculation and governance of benchmark rates, including concerns about manipulation and lack of transparency. As a result, regulators and industry participants have been working to reform interbank rates and transition to alternative reference rates, such as the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) in the United States and the Euro Short-Term Rate (€STR) in the eurozone.

In conclusion, the historical origin of interbank rates can be traced back to the emergence of modern banking systems and the need for banks to manage their liquidity. These rates have evolved over time, with benchmarks like LIBOR becoming widely used as reference rates in global financial markets. However, ongoing reforms are reshaping the landscape of interbank rates to address concerns about transparency and reliability.

How have interbank rates evolved over time?

Interbank rates, also known as interbank lending rates or simply IBOR (Interbank Offered Rate), have undergone significant changes and evolution over time. These rates play a crucial role in the functioning of the global financial system, serving as a benchmark for various financial transactions and influencing interest rates across different markets. Understanding the historical evolution of interbank rates provides valuable insights into the development of the financial industry and the challenges it has faced.

The concept of interbank lending and borrowing dates back to the early days of banking. In the 19th century, interbank rates were primarily determined through direct negotiations between banks. These rates were influenced by factors such as market conditions, creditworthiness of the borrowing bank, and prevailing economic conditions. However, this system lacked transparency and consistency, leading to inefficiencies and potential market manipulation.

To address these issues, central banks began to play a more prominent role in setting interbank rates. The establishment of central banks in various countries brought about a more standardized approach to determining these rates. Central banks started to use their policy rates, such as the discount rate or the repo rate, as reference rates for interbank lending. This approach provided a more transparent and reliable benchmark for interbank transactions.

In the mid-20th century, the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) emerged as a widely used benchmark for interbank lending. LIBOR was established in 1984 by the British Bankers' Association (BBA) and represented the average interest rate at which major London-based banks could borrow from each other. It quickly gained popularity due to its simplicity and widespread adoption by financial institutions globally.

However, over time, concerns regarding the reliability and integrity of LIBOR arose. The financial crisis of 2008 exposed significant flaws in the rate-setting process, as it was discovered that some banks had manipulated LIBOR for their own benefit. This led to a loss of trust in the benchmark and raised questions about its credibility.

In response to these concerns, regulatory authorities and industry stakeholders initiated efforts to reform interbank rates. One of the key developments was the decision to transition away from LIBOR and other interbank rates to alternative reference rates. The Alternative Reference Rates Committee (ARRC) in the United States recommended the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) as a replacement for USD LIBOR. Similarly, other countries and regions, such as the Eurozone and Japan, have introduced their own alternative rates.

The transition from LIBOR to alternative rates is a complex process that involves addressing various challenges, including contract modifications, system updates, and market-wide adoption. The aim is to establish more robust and transparent benchmark rates that are based on actual transactions and reflect the underlying market dynamics.

In conclusion, interbank rates have evolved significantly over time, transitioning from a system based on direct negotiations to one driven by central bank policy rates and then to widely used benchmarks like LIBOR. However, concerns regarding the reliability and integrity of these benchmarks have necessitated reforms and the development of alternative reference rates. The ongoing transition aims to establish more reliable and transparent benchmarks that better reflect the dynamics of the interbank lending market.

What were the key factors that influenced interbank rates in the past?

How did the interbank rate system develop in different countries?

The development of the interbank rate system varied across different countries, with each nation implementing its own unique approach based on its financial system, economic conditions, and regulatory framework. While the specifics may differ, the underlying objective of establishing an interbank rate system was to facilitate the smooth functioning of the banking sector, promote stability in financial markets, and provide a benchmark for interest rates in the economy. This answer will provide a historical overview of the development of interbank rate systems in several key countries.

United States:
In the United States, the interbank rate system evolved over time in response to changing financial landscapes and regulatory reforms. Prior to the establishment of the Federal Reserve System in 1913, interbank lending occurred through informal networks and private arrangements. However, the Federal Reserve Act provided a legal framework for the central bank to influence interest rates and stabilize the banking system. The Federal Reserve began actively managing short-term interest rates through open market operations and discount window lending, which played a crucial role in shaping the interbank rate system. Over the years, various interest rate benchmarks emerged, such as the federal funds rate, which represents the rate at which depository institutions lend reserves to each other overnight.

United Kingdom:
In the United Kingdom, the development of the interbank rate system can be traced back to the establishment of the Bank of England in 1694. Initially, interbank lending occurred informally among London's private banks. However, as the financial system expanded, the Bank of England started to play a more prominent role in managing interest rates and providing stability to the banking sector. In 1906, the Bankers' Clearing House was established to facilitate interbank settlements and promote cooperation among banks. This paved the way for the emergence of various interbank interest rate benchmarks, including the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), which became a widely used reference rate for numerous financial contracts globally.

Eurozone:
The development of the interbank rate system in the Eurozone was influenced by the creation of the European Monetary Union (EMU) and the introduction of the euro as a common currency. The establishment of the European Central Bank (ECB) in 1998 marked a significant milestone in the region's monetary integration. The ECB took on the responsibility of setting interest rates for the euro area, which affected interbank lending rates. The main benchmark rate in the Eurozone is the Euro Interbank Offered Rate (Euribor), which reflects the average interest rate at which a panel of European banks lend to one another. The Euribor serves as a reference rate for various financial products, including loans, derivatives, and mortgages.

Japan:
In Japan, the interbank rate system has undergone several transformations throughout history. Following World War II, Japan experienced rapid economic growth and financial market development. The Bank of Japan (BOJ) played a crucial role in shaping the interbank rate system by implementing monetary policy measures and managing interest rates. In 1986, the BOJ introduced the Call Money Market, which provided a platform for interbank lending and borrowing. The uncollateralized overnight call rate emerged as a key benchmark rate in Japan, reflecting short-term borrowing costs among financial institutions.

Overall, the development of interbank rate systems in different countries was influenced by factors such as the establishment of central banks, regulatory reforms, financial market structures, and monetary policy frameworks. These systems have played a vital role in facilitating liquidity management, determining borrowing costs, and serving as reference rates for various financial transactions.

What were the major challenges faced in establishing interbank rates historically?

The establishment of interbank rates historically faced several major challenges, stemming from the complexities of the financial system, the need for coordination among banks, and the inherent risks associated with interbank lending. These challenges can be broadly categorized into three main areas: data availability and accuracy, market structure and competition, and regulatory oversight.

Firstly, one of the primary challenges in establishing interbank rates historically was related to data availability and accuracy. Interbank rates are typically calculated based on the average interest rates at which banks lend to each other in the interbank market. However, obtaining accurate and reliable data on these transactions proved to be a significant hurdle. In the early days, banks relied on self-reporting, where each bank would provide its own lending rates. This approach was prone to manipulation and lacked transparency, leading to concerns about the accuracy and integrity of the reported rates.

To address this challenge, efforts were made to establish more robust and reliable data collection mechanisms. Central banks and industry associations started to play a crucial role in collecting and verifying interbank lending data. For instance, central banks began conducting surveys or collecting transaction-level data from participating banks to calculate interbank rates. These initiatives aimed to enhance the accuracy and credibility of the rates by reducing reliance on self-reported data.

The second major challenge in establishing interbank rates historically was related to market structure and competition. The interbank market is characterized by a network of banks with varying sizes, risk profiles, and borrowing needs. This heterogeneity posed challenges in determining a single representative rate that adequately reflected the prevailing market conditions.

Different methodologies were employed to address this challenge. One approach was to calculate interbank rates based on a weighted average of lending rates reported by a panel of selected banks. The composition of this panel was carefully determined to ensure representation from various segments of the banking sector. However, determining the appropriate weightings for each bank's contribution remained a challenge, as it required striking a balance between the size of the bank and its creditworthiness.

Another approach involved using a reference bank or a group of banks as a benchmark for interbank rates. This method aimed to capture the rates at which the most creditworthy banks transacted, thereby reflecting the lowest risk premium. However, this approach faced criticism for potentially excluding smaller or riskier banks, which could lead to an incomplete representation of the market.

The third major challenge in establishing interbank rates historically was related to regulatory oversight. The interbank market plays a critical role in the overall stability of the financial system, and ensuring the integrity and reliability of interbank rates is of paramount importance. However, historically, there was limited regulatory oversight and supervision over the calculation and reporting of interbank rates.

This lack of oversight created opportunities for manipulation and misconduct. Notably, the most infamous case of manipulation was the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) scandal, where several banks were found to have manipulated LIBOR rates for their own benefit. This scandal highlighted the need for stronger regulatory frameworks and increased transparency in the calculation and reporting of interbank rates.

In response to these challenges, regulatory authorities implemented various reforms. These reforms included enhancing data collection processes, introducing stricter reporting standards, and imposing penalties for misconduct. Additionally, efforts were made to transition from self-reported rates to transaction-based rates, such as the secured overnight financing rate (SOFR), which is based on actual transactions in the repurchase agreement market.

In conclusion, establishing interbank rates historically faced significant challenges related to data availability and accuracy, market structure and competition, and regulatory oversight. Over time, efforts have been made to address these challenges through improved data collection mechanisms, refined methodologies for rate calculation, and enhanced regulatory frameworks. These ongoing efforts aim to ensure the reliability, transparency, and integrity of interbank rates, which are crucial for maintaining financial stability and facilitating efficient interbank lending.

How did the global financial crises impact interbank rates throughout history?

The global financial crises have had a profound impact on interbank rates throughout history. These crises, characterized by severe disruptions in the financial system, have led to significant changes in the dynamics of interbank lending and borrowing. To understand the impact of these crises on interbank rates, it is crucial to examine key historical events and their repercussions.

One of the most notable financial crises in history is the Great Depression of the 1930s. During this period, interbank rates experienced a sharp increase as banks faced liquidity shortages and heightened counterparty risk. The collapse of numerous banks and the widespread panic among depositors led to a loss of confidence in the banking system. As a result, interbank lending became increasingly scarce, causing rates to surge. Central banks intervened by implementing measures such as interest rate cuts and liquidity injections to stabilize interbank rates and restore confidence in the financial system.

Another significant crisis that impacted interbank rates was the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) of 2007-2008. The GFC originated from the subprime mortgage market in the United States and quickly spread globally, leading to a severe credit crunch. Interbank rates soared as banks became reluctant to lend to one another due to concerns about counterparty risk and uncertainty surrounding the value of mortgage-backed securities. This lack of trust among banks resulted in a liquidity freeze, causing interbank rates to spike to unprecedented levels. Central banks worldwide responded by implementing extraordinary measures, including massive liquidity injections, interest rate cuts, and unconventional monetary policies, to stabilize interbank rates and prevent a complete collapse of the financial system.

The impact of the global financial crises on interbank rates extended beyond the immediate periods of turmoil. In the aftermath of these crises, regulatory authorities recognized the need for enhanced oversight and risk management in the financial sector. This led to the implementation of stricter regulations, such as Basel III, which aimed to strengthen banks' capital requirements and improve their resilience to future shocks. These regulatory changes had a lasting impact on interbank rates by influencing banks' lending behavior and risk appetite.

Furthermore, the global financial crises highlighted the interconnectedness of financial institutions and the importance of international cooperation in managing systemic risks. Central banks and regulatory authorities collaborated more closely to address the challenges posed by these crises. This increased coordination helped stabilize interbank rates and restore confidence in the financial system.

In conclusion, the global financial crises have had a significant impact on interbank rates throughout history. These crises led to heightened counterparty risk, liquidity shortages, and a loss of confidence in the banking system, causing interbank rates to surge. Central banks responded with various measures to stabilize interbank rates and restore market confidence. The aftermath of these crises also brought about regulatory changes aimed at strengthening the financial sector's resilience. The lessons learned from these crises have shaped the way interbank rates are managed and regulated today.

What role did central banks play in shaping historical interbank rates?

Central banks have played a crucial role in shaping historical interbank rates throughout the years. As the primary monetary authority in a country or a group of countries, central banks have the responsibility of maintaining price stability, promoting economic growth, and ensuring the stability of the financial system. Interbank rates, which represent the interest rates at which banks lend to each other, are an essential component of the overall monetary policy framework.

One of the key ways central banks influence interbank rates is through their control over the supply of money and credit in the economy. By adjusting the level of reserves that banks are required to hold, central banks can influence the liquidity conditions in the banking system. When central banks increase the supply of money by purchasing government securities or providing loans to commercial banks, they inject liquidity into the system, leading to a decrease in interbank rates. Conversely, when central banks reduce the money supply by selling government securities or tightening lending conditions, they can push interbank rates higher.

Central banks also use open market operations as a tool to influence interbank rates. Open market operations involve buying or selling government securities in the open market. When central banks buy government securities from commercial banks, they increase the reserves of these banks, leading to a decrease in interbank rates. Conversely, when central banks sell government securities to commercial banks, they reduce bank reserves, which can push interbank rates higher.

Furthermore, central banks often set a benchmark interest rate, such as a policy rate or a discount rate, which serves as a reference point for interbank rates. This benchmark rate is typically used to guide monetary policy and influence borrowing costs throughout the economy. Commercial banks often base their lending rates on this benchmark rate, which indirectly affects interbank rates. By adjusting the benchmark rate, central banks can influence interbank rates and subsequently impact lending and borrowing activities in the banking system.

During times of financial stress or crisis, central banks play a critical role in stabilizing interbank rates. They act as lenders of last resort, providing emergency liquidity to banks facing liquidity shortages. By offering loans or accepting collateral from banks, central banks ensure that the interbank lending market continues to function smoothly, preventing a potential freeze in lending and a subsequent increase in interbank rates. This intervention helps maintain stability in the financial system and prevents systemic risks from spreading.

In summary, central banks have a significant influence on historical interbank rates through their control over the money supply, open market operations, benchmark interest rates, and acting as lenders of last resort. Their actions aim to maintain price stability, promote economic growth, and safeguard the stability of the financial system. By actively shaping interbank rates, central banks play a crucial role in steering monetary policy and influencing the overall functioning of the banking system.

How did technological advancements affect the historical development of interbank rates?

Technological advancements have played a significant role in shaping the historical development of interbank rates. Over the years, various technological innovations have revolutionized the way financial institutions interact and conduct transactions, leading to profound changes in the interbank lending market. This answer will explore the impact of technological advancements on interbank rates across different time periods.

In the early days of interbank lending, before the advent of modern technology, communication and information exchange were relatively slow and cumbersome. Banks relied on manual processes, such as phone calls and physical documentation, to negotiate and settle interbank transactions. This manual approach often resulted in delays, inefficiencies, and increased operational costs. As a consequence, interbank rates were influenced by factors such as geographical proximity, personal relationships, and trust among banks.

The introduction of computer systems and electronic networks in the 1960s and 1970s marked a significant turning point in the history of interbank rates. The development of electronic funds transfer systems, such as SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication), enabled banks to exchange financial messages securely and efficiently. This enhanced communication infrastructure facilitated faster negotiations and settlements, reducing transaction costs and increasing market transparency. Consequently, interbank rates became more responsive to market forces and less dependent on personal relationships.

The widespread adoption of computerized trading platforms in the 1980s further transformed the interbank lending market. Electronic trading systems, such as Reuters Dealing and EBS (Electronic Broking Service), provided banks with real-time access to interbank rates and allowed for direct electronic trading between counterparties. These platforms facilitated price discovery, increased market liquidity, and reduced information asymmetry among market participants. As a result, interbank rates became more standardized and reflective of prevailing market conditions.

The emergence of the internet in the 1990s brought about another wave of technological advancements that profoundly impacted interbank rates. Online banking platforms and electronic payment systems enabled banks to conduct interbank transactions seamlessly and securely. The automation of processes, such as loan origination, credit scoring, and risk assessment, streamlined the lending process and reduced operational costs. This automation, coupled with the ability to access a broader pool of counterparties globally, increased competition in the interbank lending market, leading to further efficiency gains and tighter spreads between interbank rates.

In recent years, the rise of financial technology (fintech) has introduced new dynamics to the interbank lending landscape. Fintech companies leverage advanced technologies, such as artificial intelligence and blockchain, to offer innovative financial services and disrupt traditional banking models. Peer-to-peer lending platforms, for instance, enable direct lending between individuals and institutions, bypassing traditional intermediaries. While these developments have not yet had a significant impact on interbank rates, they have the potential to reshape the market in the future.

In conclusion, technological advancements have had a profound influence on the historical development of interbank rates. From the introduction of electronic communication systems to the automation of trading platforms and the emergence of online banking, each wave of technological innovation has brought increased efficiency, transparency, and competition to the interbank lending market. As technology continues to evolve, it is likely that interbank rates will further adapt to changing market dynamics, driven by advancements in areas such as fintech and digital currencies.

What were the historical implications of changes in interbank rate benchmarks?

The historical implications of changes in interbank rate benchmarks have been significant and far-reaching, shaping the financial landscape and influencing various stakeholders. Interbank rates serve as crucial benchmarks for pricing and valuing financial instruments, determining borrowing costs, and assessing the overall health of the banking system. Understanding the historical context of these changes provides valuable insights into the evolution of financial markets and the impact on economic stability.

One of the key historical implications of changes in interbank rate benchmarks is their role in monetary policy transmission. Central banks often use interbank rates as a tool to implement and control monetary policy. By adjusting these rates, central banks can influence borrowing costs, liquidity conditions, and ultimately, economic activity. Changes in interbank rates can signal shifts in monetary policy stance, reflecting efforts to stimulate or restrain economic growth. For instance, during periods of economic expansion, central banks may raise interbank rates to curb inflationary pressures, while during economic downturns, they may lower rates to encourage lending and stimulate economic activity.

Another historical implication of changes in interbank rate benchmarks is their impact on financial markets and investor behavior. Interbank rates serve as reference rates for a wide range of financial instruments, including loans, bonds, derivatives, and mortgages. Changes in these benchmark rates can lead to significant repricing of these instruments, affecting the profitability and risk profiles of financial institutions and investors. For example, an increase in interbank rates can result in higher borrowing costs for businesses and consumers, potentially dampening investment and consumption. Conversely, a decrease in rates can stimulate borrowing and investment activity.

Furthermore, changes in interbank rate benchmarks have played a crucial role in financial crises throughout history. The global financial crisis of 2008 highlighted the importance of interbank rates as indicators of systemic risk and liquidity conditions. The collapse of Lehman Brothers and subsequent turmoil in interbank lending markets led to a sharp increase in interbank rates, reflecting heightened counterparty risk and a loss of confidence among financial institutions. This disruption in interbank lending had severe consequences, as it impaired the functioning of the financial system, restricted credit availability, and contributed to the deepening of the crisis.

Additionally, changes in interbank rate benchmarks have prompted regulatory reforms aimed at enhancing transparency, reliability, and stability in financial markets. The manipulation scandal surrounding the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) in the early 2010s exposed significant weaknesses in benchmark rate-setting processes. This event led to a global effort to reform interbank rate benchmarks, resulting in the development of alternative reference rates, such as the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) in the United States and the Sterling Overnight Index Average (SONIA) in the United Kingdom. These reforms aim to address the vulnerabilities of previous benchmarks and restore trust in the financial system.

In conclusion, changes in interbank rate benchmarks have had profound historical implications across various dimensions. They have influenced monetary policy transmission, impacted financial markets and investor behavior, played a role in financial crises, and prompted regulatory reforms. Understanding these historical implications is crucial for comprehending the dynamics of interbank rates and their broader impact on the economy and financial system.

How did historical regulatory frameworks impact interbank rates?

Historical regulatory frameworks have played a significant role in shaping and impacting interbank rates over time. These frameworks, established by central banks and regulatory authorities, have aimed to maintain stability, promote transparency, and manage risks within the financial system. By examining the historical evolution of regulatory frameworks, we can gain insights into their impact on interbank rates.

One of the earliest regulatory frameworks that influenced interbank rates was the establishment of central banks. Central banks were created to oversee monetary policy and maintain financial stability. They often acted as lenders of last resort, providing liquidity to commercial banks during times of financial distress. By offering this support, central banks aimed to prevent bank failures and stabilize interbank lending, which in turn influenced interbank rates.

During the mid-20th century, many countries implemented interest rate controls as part of their regulatory frameworks. These controls set limits on the interest rates that banks could charge on loans and deposits. While these controls were intended to protect consumers and promote economic stability, they often led to distortions in interbank rates. Banks faced constraints on their ability to price loans based on market conditions, resulting in artificially low interbank rates. This created a disconnect between interbank rates and market forces, impacting the efficiency of the interbank lending market.

In response to the challenges posed by interest rate controls, many countries began to liberalize their financial systems in the late 20th century. This involved removing or relaxing interest rate controls and allowing market forces to determine interbank rates. Liberalization aimed to enhance competition, improve efficiency, and align interbank rates with market conditions. As a result, interbank rates became more responsive to changes in supply and demand dynamics, reflecting the true cost of borrowing in the market.

The global financial crisis of 2008 prompted a reevaluation of regulatory frameworks worldwide. The crisis revealed weaknesses in the financial system and highlighted the interconnectedness of banks through interbank lending. In response, regulatory authorities implemented stricter regulations to enhance financial stability and reduce systemic risks. These regulations included higher capital requirements, improved risk management practices, and increased transparency in interbank lending. While these measures aimed to mitigate risks, they also impacted interbank rates. Banks faced higher costs due to increased capital requirements, which could be reflected in higher interbank rates.

Furthermore, central banks have utilized monetary policy tools to influence interbank rates. By adjusting key interest rates, such as the benchmark policy rate, central banks can influence borrowing costs for banks and, consequently, interbank rates. For example, during periods of economic downturns, central banks may lower interest rates to stimulate lending and economic activity. Conversely, during periods of inflationary pressures, central banks may raise interest rates to curb inflation. These adjustments have a direct impact on interbank rates, as they influence the cost of funds for banks and shape their lending behavior.

In summary, historical regulatory frameworks have had a profound impact on interbank rates. The establishment of central banks, interest rate controls, financial liberalization, and post-financial crisis regulations have all shaped the dynamics of interbank lending and influenced interbank rates. These frameworks have aimed to maintain stability, promote transparency, and manage risks within the financial system. Understanding the historical evolution of regulatory frameworks is crucial for comprehending the factors that have influenced interbank rates over time.

What were the historical consequences of manipulating interbank rates?

The manipulation of interbank rates has had significant historical consequences, impacting financial markets, institutions, and economies worldwide. This practice, often referred to as rate rigging, has been associated with various negative outcomes, including market distortions, erosion of trust, legal repercussions, and economic instability.

One of the most notable instances of interbank rate manipulation occurred during the global financial crisis of 2007-2008. It was revealed that several major banks had been manipulating the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), a benchmark interest rate used as a reference for trillions of dollars in financial contracts globally. By submitting false rates or colluding with other banks to manipulate LIBOR, these institutions aimed to benefit their own trading positions and enhance their perceived financial health.

The consequences of this manipulation were far-reaching. Firstly, it distorted the accuracy and reliability of LIBOR as a benchmark rate. This undermined the integrity of financial markets, as LIBOR was widely used in various financial products such as loans, derivatives, and mortgages. The manipulation led to mispricing of these instruments, affecting both borrowers and lenders. Borrowers may have paid higher interest rates than they should have, while lenders may have received lower returns on their investments.

Moreover, the manipulation of interbank rates eroded trust in the banking sector. The revelation that major financial institutions were involved in such misconduct damaged their reputations and raised concerns about their ethical practices. This loss of trust had broader implications for the industry as a whole, as it increased skepticism among investors, regulators, and the general public.

The consequences of rate rigging were not limited to reputational damage. Legal repercussions followed as authorities around the world launched investigations and imposed hefty fines on the banks involved. These fines amounted to billions of dollars and served as a deterrent against future misconduct. Additionally, criminal charges were brought against individuals responsible for the manipulation, leading to convictions and imprisonment in some cases.

Furthermore, the manipulation of interbank rates had broader macroeconomic consequences. The financial crisis highlighted the interconnectedness of global financial markets, and the manipulation of LIBOR exacerbated systemic risks. As trust in the financial system eroded, liquidity dried up, and credit conditions tightened. This had a detrimental impact on economic growth, as businesses faced difficulties in accessing affordable credit, leading to reduced investment and job creation.

To address the consequences of rate rigging, regulatory authorities implemented reforms aimed at enhancing the transparency and reliability of interbank rates. For instance, in the case of LIBOR, efforts were made to transition to alternative reference rates based on more robust transaction data. These reforms sought to restore confidence in benchmark rates and prevent future manipulation.

In conclusion, the historical consequences of manipulating interbank rates have been significant and wide-ranging. Rate rigging distorted financial markets, eroded trust in the banking sector, resulted in legal repercussions, and contributed to economic instability. The aftermath of such manipulation has prompted regulatory reforms to mitigate these consequences and restore integrity to interbank rates.

How did historical economic events shape interbank rates?

Historical economic events have played a significant role in shaping interbank rates throughout history. Interbank rates, also known as the overnight lending rates between banks, are influenced by a multitude of factors, including economic conditions, monetary policy decisions, financial crises, and regulatory changes. Understanding the impact of these events is crucial in comprehending the evolution of interbank rates over time.

One of the earliest significant events that shaped interbank rates was the Great Depression of the 1930s. The severe economic downturn led to a contraction in economic activity and a decline in bank liquidity. As a result, interbank lending became riskier, leading to an increase in interbank rates. Banks were reluctant to lend to each other due to the fear of counterparty default, which further exacerbated the liquidity crisis. This period highlighted the importance of interbank rates as a reflection of market confidence and liquidity conditions.

The post-World War II era witnessed the establishment of central banks as key players in monetary policy. Central banks began using interbank rates as a tool to influence economic activity and control inflation. For instance, during the 1950s and 1960s, central banks often targeted specific interbank rates to manage credit availability and stimulate economic growth. By adjusting these rates, central banks could encourage or discourage borrowing between banks, thereby affecting overall lending and investment levels.

The 1970s marked a turning point for interbank rates due to the oil crisis and subsequent inflationary pressures. As inflation soared, central banks adopted tighter monetary policies to combat rising prices. This led to an increase in interbank rates as central banks aimed to reduce liquidity and curb borrowing. The higher interbank rates were intended to discourage excessive lending and dampen inflationary pressures. Consequently, businesses and consumers faced higher borrowing costs, which impacted economic growth.

The 1980s and 1990s witnessed financial deregulation and globalization, which had profound effects on interbank rates. Financial markets became more interconnected, and banks expanded their operations globally. This increased competition among banks and facilitated the growth of interbank lending. As a result, interbank rates became more sensitive to global economic events, such as currency crises or sovereign debt defaults. These events could quickly transmit shocks across borders, leading to spikes in interbank rates as banks became more cautious about lending to potentially risky counterparties.

The global financial crisis of 2008 had a transformative impact on interbank rates. The collapse of Lehman Brothers and subsequent turmoil in financial markets resulted in a severe liquidity crunch. Interbank lending froze as banks became wary of the creditworthiness of their counterparts. Central banks intervened by implementing unconventional monetary policies, such as quantitative easing and providing liquidity support to stabilize interbank rates. These measures aimed to restore confidence and encourage lending between banks, ultimately reducing interbank rates.

In recent years, regulatory changes have also influenced interbank rates. The Basel III framework introduced stricter capital and liquidity requirements for banks, making interbank lending more secure. This has led to a decline in interbank rates as the perceived risk associated with lending between banks has reduced.

In conclusion, historical economic events have significantly shaped interbank rates. From the Great Depression to the global financial crisis, these events have highlighted the importance of interbank rates as indicators of market confidence and liquidity conditions. The role of central banks, financial deregulation, globalization, and regulatory changes have all played a part in shaping interbank rates throughout history. Understanding these historical events is crucial in comprehending the dynamics and evolution of interbank rates over time.

What were the historical trends in interbank rate volatility?

The historical trends in interbank rate volatility have been influenced by various factors and have exhibited fluctuations over time. Interbank rates, also known as the overnight lending rates between banks, play a crucial role in the functioning of financial markets and the overall economy. Understanding the historical patterns of interbank rate volatility is essential for policymakers, financial institutions, and market participants to assess risk, make informed decisions, and implement effective monetary policies.

One significant period that witnessed notable interbank rate volatility was the global financial crisis of 2007-2008. The crisis originated in the United States housing market and quickly spread to the global financial system, leading to a severe liquidity crunch. Interbank rates surged during this period as banks became increasingly hesitant to lend to one another due to concerns about counterparty risk and solvency. This resulted in a spike in interbank rates, indicating heightened uncertainty and a lack of confidence in the financial system.

Following the financial crisis, central banks around the world implemented various measures to stabilize interbank rates and restore confidence in the banking sector. These measures included injecting liquidity into the system, lowering policy interest rates, and implementing unconventional monetary policies such as quantitative easing. As a result, interbank rates gradually declined and volatility subsided.

Another notable period of interbank rate volatility occurred during the European sovereign debt crisis, which began in 2010. The crisis originated from concerns about the sustainability of government debt in several European countries, particularly Greece, Portugal, Ireland, Italy, and Spain. As investors grew increasingly worried about the creditworthiness of these countries, interbank rates surged, reflecting heightened risk aversion and concerns about potential defaults.

To address the European sovereign debt crisis, the European Central Bank (ECB) implemented various measures to stabilize interbank rates and restore confidence in the eurozone banking system. The ECB provided liquidity support to banks through long-term refinancing operations (LTROs) and outright monetary transactions (OMTs). These measures helped to alleviate interbank rate volatility and restore stability in the European financial markets.

In recent years, interbank rate volatility has generally remained low due to the accommodative monetary policies pursued by central banks in response to the global economic slowdown and the COVID-19 pandemic. Central banks have implemented measures such as lowering policy interest rates, providing ample liquidity, and conducting asset purchase programs. These actions have helped to keep interbank rates relatively stable and reduce volatility.

It is important to note that interbank rate volatility can also be influenced by other factors such as changes in market sentiment, economic indicators, geopolitical events, and regulatory changes. Additionally, the level of interbank rate volatility can vary across different countries and regions, depending on their specific economic and financial conditions.

In conclusion, the historical trends in interbank rate volatility have been shaped by various factors and have exhibited fluctuations over time. Periods of financial crises and economic uncertainties have often led to increased interbank rate volatility, reflecting heightened risk aversion and concerns about counterparty risk. Central banks play a crucial role in stabilizing interbank rates through their monetary policy actions and liquidity provision. Understanding these historical trends is essential for assessing risk, implementing effective monetary policies, and maintaining stability in the financial system.

How did historical changes in monetary policy influence interbank rates?

Historical changes in monetary policy have played a significant role in influencing interbank rates. Interbank rates, also known as the overnight lending rates between banks, are affected by various factors, including central bank policies, economic conditions, and market dynamics. Monetary policy, which refers to the actions taken by central banks to manage money supply and interest rates, has a direct impact on interbank rates.

One of the key tools used by central banks to influence interbank rates is the adjustment of the benchmark interest rate, often referred to as the policy rate. Central banks typically use this rate to signal their stance on monetary policy and to influence borrowing costs in the economy. When a central bank raises its benchmark interest rate, it becomes more expensive for banks to borrow from the central bank, which in turn increases interbank rates. Conversely, when the benchmark interest rate is lowered, borrowing costs decrease, leading to a decline in interbank rates.

Historically, changes in monetary policy have been driven by various economic factors and policy objectives. During periods of economic expansion and inflationary pressures, central banks tend to adopt a tighter monetary policy stance. This involves raising interest rates to curb inflation and prevent excessive borrowing and spending. As a result, interbank rates increase, reflecting the higher cost of borrowing for banks.

Conversely, during periods of economic downturn or recession, central banks often adopt an accommodative monetary policy stance. This involves lowering interest rates to stimulate borrowing and spending, thereby supporting economic growth. Lower interest rates reduce interbank rates, making it cheaper for banks to borrow from each other and encouraging lending activity.

It is important to note that changes in monetary policy not only affect interbank rates directly through adjustments in the benchmark interest rate but also indirectly through their impact on market expectations and liquidity conditions. Central banks' communication and forward guidance regarding future policy actions can influence market participants' expectations about future interest rate movements. These expectations can then affect interbank rates as market participants adjust their lending and borrowing behavior accordingly.

Moreover, central banks also use open market operations, such as buying or selling government securities, to manage liquidity in the banking system. By injecting liquidity through asset purchases, central banks can lower interbank rates by increasing the supply of funds available for lending. Conversely, by reducing liquidity through asset sales, central banks can raise interbank rates by reducing the availability of funds.

In summary, historical changes in monetary policy have had a significant influence on interbank rates. Central banks' adjustments to the benchmark interest rate, as well as their communication and liquidity management practices, have shaped interbank rates over time. Understanding the relationship between monetary policy and interbank rates is crucial for policymakers, market participants, and researchers in assessing the overall functioning of financial markets and the broader economy.

What were the historical implications of interbank rate fluctuations on financial markets?

Interbank rate fluctuations have had significant historical implications on financial markets, shaping the dynamics of lending, liquidity, and overall economic stability. Understanding these implications requires examining the historical context and the various ways in which interbank rate fluctuations have affected financial markets over time.

One of the key historical implications of interbank rate fluctuations is their impact on borrowing costs. When interbank rates rise, it becomes more expensive for banks to borrow from one another. This increase in borrowing costs can then be passed on to consumers and businesses through higher interest rates on loans and credit products. Consequently, higher interbank rates can dampen borrowing activity, leading to reduced investment and economic growth.

Conversely, when interbank rates decline, borrowing costs decrease, stimulating lending activity. Lower interbank rates encourage banks to extend credit more readily, making it easier for businesses and individuals to access funds. This increased liquidity can spur economic activity, fueling investment and consumption.

Interbank rate fluctuations also influence the stability of financial markets. Sharp and unexpected changes in interbank rates can create volatility and uncertainty, impacting market sentiment. For instance, a sudden increase in interbank rates may signal a tightening of credit conditions, leading to a sell-off in stocks and other riskier assets. On the other hand, a significant decrease in interbank rates might prompt investors to seek higher returns in riskier assets, potentially fueling asset bubbles.

Moreover, interbank rate fluctuations can affect the profitability and risk-taking behavior of financial institutions. Banks often rely on short-term interbank borrowing to meet their liquidity needs. When interbank rates rise sharply or become volatile, banks may face challenges in securing funding at reasonable costs. This can squeeze their profit margins and limit their ability to lend, potentially leading to a credit crunch. In extreme cases, such as during financial crises, interbank rate fluctuations can even threaten the solvency of banks, triggering systemic risks that can spread throughout the financial system.

Historically, central banks have played a crucial role in managing interbank rate fluctuations and mitigating their adverse effects on financial markets. Central banks can influence interbank rates through monetary policy tools such as open market operations, reserve requirements, and policy interest rate adjustments. By actively managing interbank rates, central banks aim to maintain price stability, support economic growth, and ensure the stability of the financial system.

In conclusion, historical interbank rate fluctuations have had far-reaching implications on financial markets. They have influenced borrowing costs, liquidity conditions, market stability, and the behavior of financial institutions. Understanding these historical implications is crucial for policymakers, investors, and market participants to navigate the complexities of the financial system and make informed decisions.

How did historical interest rate movements affect interbank rates?

Historical interest rate movements have had a significant impact on interbank rates, shaping the dynamics of the interbank lending market over time. Interbank rates are influenced by various factors, including central bank policies, market conditions, and economic indicators. Understanding the historical context of interest rate movements provides valuable insights into the evolution of interbank rates.

One key aspect to consider is the relationship between central bank policy rates and interbank rates. Central banks play a crucial role in setting monetary policy and often use interest rates as a tool to manage economic conditions. When central banks raise or lower their policy rates, it directly affects interbank rates. An increase in policy rates tends to lead to higher interbank rates, as banks pass on the higher borrowing costs to each other. Conversely, a decrease in policy rates generally results in lower interbank rates, as banks can borrow at cheaper rates.

Historically, interest rate movements have been influenced by macroeconomic factors such as inflation, economic growth, and financial stability. During periods of high inflation, central banks tend to raise interest rates to curb inflationary pressures. This tightening of monetary policy leads to higher interbank rates as borrowing becomes more expensive. Conversely, during periods of low inflation or economic downturns, central banks may lower interest rates to stimulate economic activity. This easing of monetary policy results in lower interbank rates as borrowing costs decrease.

Financial crises and market disruptions have also played a significant role in shaping historical interest rate movements and their impact on interbank rates. For instance, during the global financial crisis of 2008, interbank rates soared as banks became reluctant to lend to each other due to heightened credit risk and liquidity concerns. This led to a liquidity crunch in the interbank market, causing interbank rates to spike. Central banks intervened by implementing various measures, such as providing liquidity support and lowering policy rates, to stabilize interbank rates and restore confidence in the financial system.

Moreover, interest rate movements in one country can spill over to affect interbank rates in other countries, especially in an interconnected global financial system. Changes in global interest rate differentials and currency exchange rates can influence cross-border interbank lending and borrowing. For example, if a country raises its interest rates significantly, it may attract foreign investors seeking higher returns. This influx of capital can impact interbank rates in the recipient country as banks compete for funds.

In summary, historical interest rate movements have had a profound impact on interbank rates. Central bank policies, macroeconomic factors, financial crises, and global interconnectedness all contribute to the dynamics of interbank rates. Understanding the historical context of interest rate movements provides valuable insights into the functioning of the interbank lending market and its sensitivity to various economic and financial factors.

What were the historical differences in interbank rates across various currencies?

The historical differences in interbank rates across various currencies have been influenced by a multitude of factors, including economic conditions, monetary policies, market dynamics, and geopolitical events. Understanding these differences is crucial for comprehending the global financial landscape and the interconnectedness of economies.

One of the most prominent interbank rates is the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), which has historically served as a benchmark for short-term interest rates in major currencies. Prior to the financial crisis of 2007-2008, LIBOR rates across different currencies generally exhibited similar trends, reflecting the stability and integration of global financial markets. However, significant variations did exist due to country-specific factors.

In the United States, the interbank rate is represented by the Federal Funds Rate (FFR). Historically, the FFR has generally been lower than LIBOR due to the U.S. Federal Reserve's monetary policy objectives aimed at stimulating economic growth and maintaining price stability. This lower rate incentivizes banks to lend to each other, thereby increasing liquidity in the banking system.

In contrast, the European interbank rates have shown more diversity due to the existence of multiple currencies within the Eurozone. Before the introduction of the euro, interbank rates varied across European countries. However, with the establishment of the European Central Bank (ECB) and the adoption of a single currency, interbank rates within the Eurozone have converged to a large extent. The ECB sets its own benchmark rate, known as the Main Refinancing Operations rate, which influences interbank rates within the Eurozone.

Other major currencies such as the Japanese yen and the British pound also have their own interbank rates. Historically, Japan has experienced persistently low interest rates due to deflationary pressures and the Bank of Japan's accommodative monetary policy. On the other hand, the British pound has generally had higher interbank rates compared to other major currencies due to the Bank of England's focus on inflation control.

It is important to note that historical differences in interbank rates across various currencies have not remained static. They have evolved over time in response to changing economic conditions and policy measures. For instance, the global financial crisis led to a significant increase in interbank rates as banks became more cautious about lending to each other. Similarly, during periods of economic uncertainty or currency crises, interbank rates can experience sharp fluctuations.

In recent years, efforts have been made to transition away from LIBOR as a benchmark rate due to concerns about its reliability and susceptibility to manipulation. The replacement of LIBOR with alternative reference rates, such as the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) in the United States and the Euro Short-Term Rate (€STR) in the Eurozone, will likely impact the historical differences in interbank rates across currencies.

In conclusion, the historical differences in interbank rates across various currencies have been shaped by a range of factors including economic conditions, monetary policies, market dynamics, and geopolitical events. Understanding these differences is crucial for comprehending the global financial landscape and the dynamics of interbank lending.

How did historical changes in market liquidity impact interbank rates?

Historical changes in market liquidity have had a significant impact on interbank rates. Interbank rates, also known as the overnight lending rate between banks, are influenced by the availability of liquidity in the market. Liquidity refers to the ease with which assets can be bought or sold without causing significant price movements. When market liquidity is high, there is an abundance of funds available for lending, leading to lower interbank rates. Conversely, when market liquidity is low, interbank rates tend to rise.

During periods of ample liquidity, such as economic expansions or periods of loose monetary policy, banks have excess funds that they can lend to other banks. This surplus liquidity drives down the demand for borrowing and lowers interbank rates. In such circumstances, banks are more willing to lend to each other at lower interest rates, as they have confidence in the availability of funds.

Conversely, during times of tight liquidity, such as economic contractions or periods of restrictive monetary policy, banks face a shortage of funds. This scarcity of liquidity increases the demand for borrowing and pushes interbank rates higher. Banks become more cautious about lending to each other and may require higher interest rates to compensate for the perceived risk associated with lending in a tight liquidity environment.

Historically, changes in market liquidity have been influenced by various factors. Central banks play a crucial role in managing liquidity in the financial system through their monetary policy actions. For example, during times of economic downturns or financial crises, central banks often implement expansionary monetary policies to inject liquidity into the market and stimulate economic activity. These measures typically involve lowering interest rates and providing additional liquidity to banks through open market operations or direct lending.

Moreover, changes in market sentiment and investor behavior can also impact liquidity conditions. During periods of heightened uncertainty or market stress, investors may become more risk-averse and seek safer assets, leading to a reduction in market liquidity. This can result in higher interbank rates as banks become more reluctant to lend to each other.

Additionally, changes in regulatory frameworks and market structures can influence market liquidity and subsequently affect interbank rates. For instance, the implementation of Basel III regulations following the global financial crisis aimed to enhance the stability and resilience of the banking system. These regulations imposed stricter capital and liquidity requirements on banks, which could impact their ability to lend and, consequently, interbank rates.

In conclusion, historical changes in market liquidity have had a profound impact on interbank rates. The availability of liquidity in the market directly affects the supply and demand dynamics of interbank lending, leading to fluctuations in interbank rates. Factors such as economic conditions, monetary policy actions, market sentiment, and regulatory changes all contribute to the overall liquidity environment and subsequently influence interbank rates. Understanding these historical dynamics is crucial for comprehending the interplay between market liquidity and interbank rates.

What were the historical implications of interbank rate spreads between different maturities?

The historical implications of interbank rate spreads between different maturities have been significant in shaping the dynamics of financial markets and influencing various economic factors. Interbank rates, which represent the interest rates at which banks lend and borrow funds from each other, play a crucial role in determining the cost of short-term funding and liquidity in the banking system. The spreads between different maturities of interbank rates reflect the market's perception of credit risk, liquidity conditions, and expectations about future economic developments.

One important historical implication of interbank rate spreads between different maturities is their impact on monetary policy transmission. Central banks often use short-term interbank rates as a policy tool to influence borrowing costs and overall economic activity. The spread between short-term and long-term interbank rates, known as the yield curve, provides insights into market expectations for future interest rates and economic conditions. A steep yield curve, with higher long-term rates relative to short-term rates, suggests expectations of future economic expansion. Conversely, a flat or inverted yield curve, with long-term rates lower than short-term rates, may indicate expectations of economic slowdown or recession. Central banks closely monitor these spreads to assess the effectiveness of their monetary policy actions and to gauge market sentiment.

Interbank rate spreads also have implications for banks' profitability and risk management. Banks typically borrow funds at short-term interbank rates and lend them out at longer-term rates, earning a spread or margin. The size of this spread directly affects banks' profitability. When the spread between short-term and long-term interbank rates widens, banks can potentially earn higher profits through increased lending activity. Conversely, when the spread narrows or becomes negative (inverted yield curve), banks may face challenges in generating profits, as their borrowing costs may exceed their lending income. This can impact banks' lending decisions, credit availability, and overall financial stability.

Moreover, interbank rate spreads provide insights into market perceptions of credit risk and liquidity conditions. During periods of financial stress or economic uncertainty, interbank rate spreads tend to widen as banks become more cautious about lending to each other. This can reflect concerns about counterparty risk and a general tightening of credit conditions. Widening spreads can also indicate liquidity shortages in the banking system, as banks demand higher compensation for the perceived risk of lending funds for longer durations. Such episodes of increased interbank rate spreads have historically been associated with financial crises and economic downturns.

In addition to their impact on monetary policy, bank profitability, and market sentiment, interbank rate spreads between different maturities have implications for other financial markets. For example, wider spreads can affect bond markets, as they influence the pricing and yields of fixed-income securities. Investors often compare the yields on government bonds with different maturities to assess market expectations and make investment decisions. Changes in interbank rate spreads can also impact currency markets, as they affect interest rate differentials between countries and influence capital flows.

In conclusion, the historical implications of interbank rate spreads between different maturities are multifaceted and far-reaching. These spreads provide valuable insights into monetary policy transmission, banks' profitability and risk management, credit risk perceptions, liquidity conditions, and overall market sentiment. Understanding the historical dynamics of interbank rate spreads is crucial for policymakers, financial institutions, and investors in assessing economic conditions, making informed decisions, and managing risks in the financial system.

How did historical financial innovations influence interbank rates?

Historical financial innovations have played a significant role in shaping interbank rates over time. These innovations have emerged as a response to the changing needs of the financial system, market dynamics, and regulatory frameworks. By examining key historical developments, we can gain insights into how financial innovations have influenced interbank rates.

One of the earliest financial innovations that impacted interbank rates was the establishment of central banks. Central banks were created to provide stability to the financial system and act as lenders of last resort. Their role in influencing interbank rates became prominent during times of financial crises or liquidity shortages. By adjusting policy rates, central banks could influence interbank lending rates, thereby affecting the overall cost of borrowing in the economy.

The development of money markets also had a profound impact on interbank rates. Money markets emerged as a platform for short-term borrowing and lending between financial institutions. They provided a mechanism for banks to manage their liquidity needs efficiently. The introduction of money market instruments, such as Treasury bills and commercial paper, allowed banks to access short-term funds at competitive rates. The interplay between supply and demand for these instruments influenced interbank rates, reflecting market conditions and perceived credit risks.

Financial innovations in the form of securitization and structured finance also influenced interbank rates. These innovations allowed banks to package loans into tradable securities, which could be sold to investors. By transferring credit risk away from their balance sheets, banks could reduce their funding costs and potentially lower interbank rates. However, the complexity and opacity of some structured products contributed to the buildup of systemic risks, as seen during the 2008 financial crisis.

The advent of electronic trading platforms and the increased use of technology in financial markets have also impacted interbank rates. Electronic trading platforms have improved price discovery and increased transparency in interbank lending markets. This has led to more efficient allocation of funds and reduced information asymmetry among market participants. As a result, interbank rates have become more reflective of market conditions and less prone to manipulation.

Regulatory changes have also influenced interbank rates throughout history. For instance, the implementation of reserve requirements and capital adequacy regulations has affected banks' lending behavior and their willingness to lend to each other. These regulations aim to ensure the stability of the financial system but can also impact interbank rates by altering banks' cost of funds and risk appetite.

In conclusion, historical financial innovations have had a profound influence on interbank rates. The establishment of central banks, the development of money markets, securitization, structured finance, technological advancements, and regulatory changes have all shaped the dynamics of interbank lending and borrowing. Understanding these historical developments is crucial for comprehending the evolution of interbank rates and their role in the broader financial system.

Next: Understanding Interbank Rate

Previous: Introduction to Interbank Rate